CNF logo

CNF logo
Canadian Nationalist Front

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Toronto man denied subsidized housing for not being Muslim

TORONTO — A disabled Toronto man had his name removed from the waiting list of a subsidized city apartment because he does not meet the main criteria for living there: being Muslim.

“It doesn’t make any sense; I lived in Texas, that doesn’t make sense even there,” said Austin Lewis, 21, who is paralyzed and confined to a wheelchair.
Lewis is attempting to find subsidized, rent-to-income accommodations in Toronto. He has applied to dozens of apartments through Housing Connections, an organization that manages a waiting list of applicants applying for subsidized housing.

UPDATE: Toronto city councillor says Muslim-only subsidized housing is acceptable

This week, Lewis received a letter from Housing Connections, informing him he would be taken off the list for an apartment at 3001 Finch Ave. West, operated by Ahmadiyya Abode of Peace Inc.
The letter reads, in part: “The vision of this community includes providing housing for households in which at least one person is a member of Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at. This means if none of the individuals of your household are a member … you will be removed from the waiting list.”
“It’s prejudiced, it’s racist,” said Laura Whiteway of Brampton, Lewis’s mother. “It’s wrong on every single level: this goes against everything Canada represents to me.”
Whiteway contacted Global News after receiving the letter, which she says unfairly discriminates against her son because he is not Muslim.
“If it’s legal, it should not be legal; it’s insulting, that’s what it is,” she said.
Under provincial law, renters aren’t supposed to be denied accommodations on the basis of religion.
“The purpose of the Human Rights Code in Ontario is to make sure people feel as though they are part of the community and that their dignity and their worth is protected,” said Shane Martinez, a Toronto criminal defence lawyer who specializes in human rights issues.
“The Human Rights Code for the province still applies and is really the paramount legislation that needs to be given consideration in a situation like this,” Martinez added.
But the city of Toronto says the practice of allowing only certain ethnic or religious groups is legally acceptable.
“Ahmadiyya has received approval under Council authority to enter into an Agreement to establish a Mandate to restrict tenancy to ‘members of the Muslim Jama’at’ in accordance with the requirements approved by City Council in November 2002. The Agreement to Establish a Mandate has been executed by both parties and has a five year term with an effective date of Jan 1, 2015,” according to John Gosgnach, communications manager for the City of Toronto.
“The City’s mandate policy allows social housing providers to restrict their housing to individuals belonging to an identifiable ethnic or religious group if specific conditions are met,” Gosgnach said.
“The housing provider must provide the City with a legal opinion that they are meeting the requirements of Section 18 of the Ontario Human Rights Code by providing services and facilities to support the members of the identifiable ethnic or religious group.”
Gosgnach said the same provision allows other groups to do the same “including seniors, artists, aboriginal, homeless/hard-to-house, individuals with AIDS and ethnic and religious groups including Christian and individuals of Lithuanian, Macedonian, Greek, Chinese, Hungarian and German origin.”
But Whiteway says her son is already facing an uphill battle to find housing because of his physical disability; having another option taken away makes a bad situation worse.
“I thought we were moving forward,” she said. “We are a melting pot; this does not reflect that.”
Lewis says he “wouldn’t mind a bit” living in a building that was predominantly occupied by Muslims, or anyone else.
“People are people, they do what they do: they can pray to a tree, I don’t care, it doesn’t impact me,” he said.
© Shaw Media, 2015

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Anti-racists are anti-white, bigotted hatemongers and hypocrits!

I'm discriminated against at every turn, work, looking for apartments, friends and my fiances family. Why? I stand up for the white man and speak my mind and fight for the white race, all they see is my tattoos, swastika tattoos I got when I was younger to take the Gammadion back as a white pride symbol because what bonds us beyond genetics and blood are our ancient white Aryan religious symbols.

They Google me, read internet gossip and lies of communist enemies that it is their job to lie about me, never met me and assume I'm a dangerous uneducated killer because they watch too many Jewish Hollywood propaganda movies and react with a brainwashed programmed response like one of Pavlov's drooling dogs.

Who is close minded? Who is a small minded hatemonger? What kind of idiots believe left-wing internet propaganda? Dumb, ignorant, small minded, close minded, lemmings and sheep that parrot what the in-crowd says.

They rail against prejudice but these ignorant brainwashed sheep are the most prejudiced sheeple iv ever met and the most hypocritical poor lost souls iv ever encountered.

Learn to think for yourselves Sheeple...

Saturday, April 11, 2015

Our Duty For Endangered Species Protection

 We discovered an endangered bat flying around the house last-night, at first the misses freaked out and wanted it out but now I get to keep him and since its an endangered species im doing my environmental duty to protect it as I do my own kind.

Feeling a kinship to this wrongly demonized winged creature that is vital to our ecosystem and is on the endangered species list due to a fungus causing White Nose Syndrome destroying their population by 94% in recent years

Sound familiar? Sounds like the White Genocide killing off our species by forced Turd World immigration and forced race mixing breeding us out to extinction to currently 8% of the world's entire population.

We are endangered like my bat...

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Immigration Reformers Protesting Temporary Foreign Workers Programme Threatened by Anti-Racists

by: Paul Fromm

TORONTO. March 29, 2015. The long red on white banner proclaimed their message -- "Canadian Workers Come First" -- as some three dozen immigration reformers gathered this afternoon to protest a demonstration by an immigrant group pushing for temporary foreign workers to be allowed to stay indefinitely.

A group called the Migrant Workers Alliance for Change staged the protest against Temporary Foreign Workers and Live-In Caregivers being barred from working in the country for more than four years. This group also believes that all TFW's and Live-ins should remain here permanently.
The 60 or so members of this group were peaceful as they gathered outside the offices of Citizenship and Immigration Canada offices at 55 St. Clair Avenue, East.

Not so peaceful were about 7 or 8 "anti-racists" -- that's anti-White -- who screamed obscenities at the immigration reformers organized by Immigration Watch Canada. Some were masked with bandannas -- typical of "anti-racist" goons in North America and Europe.

Some of these "anti-racists" tried to block the "Canadian Workers Come First Banner". One particularly strident female in a long scarf charged at one of the women in the Immigration Watch Canada ranks and had to be deterred.

Police sought to maintain order and escorted several IWC members to their cars when they were followed and threatened by the "anti-racists".

Close to 1,000 flyers were distributed in the area calling for an end to the TFW Programme which floods Canada with 500,000 foreigners at a time when unemployment tops 1.5-million and another 900,000 Canadians, according to Statistics Canada, are involuntarily locked into part-time jobs.
"There is no skills or labour shortage," IWC organizer Ryan explained,"just a cheap labour shortage." It's time to let Canadians have jobs instead of catering to greedy employers seeking to suppress wages.

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

White Unity, Divided We fall... Gossip and Egos

In a movement already lacking in unity due to difference in beliefs and methods of furthering those different goals for the 14 words we cannot afford further divisions in our cause by infighting, gossip and battle of egos.

 If you have a problem with somebody deal with it as adults and deal directly with that person instead of being passive aggressive like children playing parents against each other.

     If you choose to defame or spread rumors about people be prepared to provide tangible facts and proof and not hearsay and instead of propagating such things ask the person being slandered whether certain things are true or false and make your own judgement instead of parroting what others may say about some due to personal reasons of jealousy or to feel important by talking about somebody you don't know.

 So please brothers and sisters I implore you to take a stand against such childish "hen-house" and "rumor mill" behavior.
   Together we stand and divided we fall! Stand for WHITE UNITY!

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Trent Central Student Association rescinds its boycott of Israel

Trent University students back down and bow to Israel and its Zionist tentacle arms in Canada by changing their colours pressured and strong-armed in a supposed vote to having no stance on Apartheid in Israel.

Motion passed on heels of anti-Semitic controversy at Trent


The following is a section of the motion that was passed by the Trent Central Student Association in 2013:
"The Association shall refrain from co-operation, collaboration, or joint projects with Israeli academic and cultural institutions in any form including sharing intellectual resources or property with Israeli universities, offering Study Abroad opportunities for students of Trent University, or hosting Israeli Academics, unless these institutions acknowledge Israel as an apa rtheid state. Additionally, the Association will support Palestinian academic and cultural institutions directly without requiring them to partner with Israeli counterparts as an explicit or implicit condition for such support."
Peterborough This Week
PETERBOROUGH -- On the heels of anti-Semitic controversy at Trent University, the Trent Central Student Association (TCSA) has decided to remove its boycott of Israel.
At a meeting last week, the students voted 47-28 to rescind a policy it passed in 2013. That policy outlined the stance the TCSA would take when dealing with items and issues related to Israel.
The TCSA sought to acknowledge Israel as an apartheid state and encourage others to reject investments, purchases and cultural exchanges with Israeli companies and groups. These included Israeli academic or cultural institutions.
Braden Freer, president of the TCSA, says the motion that was passed last week removes the boycott.
"We have no official stance on (Israel). Students are free to do (what they choose) without us having an opinion," says Mr. Freer.
Some of the issues surrounding the boycott of Israel were discussed during last week's Divestment Week events at Trent.
Controversy swelled when the logo organizers used to promote the event was hit with harsh criticism. Part of the logo showed the Israeli flag, with the Star of David, crossed out. The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre for Holocaust Studies, a human rights group based in Toronto, called the logo anti-Semitic. That sparked organizers -- the Ontario Public Interest Research Group (OPIRG) and Sustainable Trent -- to pull the logo from its advertising and social media campaigns and make a public apology.
Mr. Freer says the controversy didn't have a direct influence on the motion that was passed last Thursday (Jan. 29).
"It's not directly linked," says Mr. Freer. "The two groups (that organized Divestment Week) are separate from the TCSA."
He adds the latest motion to rescind the original motion was discussed by a member of the TCSA last September and was just brought to last week's meeting for a vote.
Avi Benlolo, president and CEO of the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre for Holocaust Studies, says it was a welcome surprise to see students at Trent vote down the boycott, divestment and sanction motion. However, he still takes issue with the Divestment Week events and movement to boycott Israel.
"What makes this outcome particularly amazing is the fact that it was non-Jewish students leading the charge," writes Mr. Benlolo, in a letter to This Week. "Clear thinking, and the recognition that boycotts serve only to shut down free speech and create an atmosphere of tension and division, has prevailed."
Trent president Dr. Leo Groarke also weighed in on the issue. In a letter, he outlined his views with regards to the controversy and issues surrounding divestment.
He says the divestment movement "is an attempt to have universities and other institutions withdraw their investments (typically endowment and pension funds) from Israeli companies, and from companies heavily involved in the production and/or use of fossil fuels."
Dr. Groarke says divestment from fossil fuel companies is currently before the Trent board of governors.
Despite the controversy, and at times heated debate during Divestment Week events, Dr. Groarke says most students took a respectful approach to the issue.
"As a university, we are committed to the free expression of different points of view and the debate that this produces. That debate is an essential element of the education we provide," writes Dr. Groarke in his letter. "We are at the same time committed to respectful debate which builds a community free of discrimination which is safe and secure for all."

Monday, January 26, 2015

Race is a Social Construct? Nope!

By H. Millard:

      Those who want to blend away all distinct peoples, and especially White people, often say that race doesn't really exist and that it is just a social construct.  Of course, what they are really saying is:  jump in bed with people of different races because it doesn't matter and we are all the same.

This is nonsense. It is also miscegenation.  It is also genocide. I call it bedroom genocide.  Feel free to use the term. Whites should not mate with non-Whites. Period. It is the death of us.

    All humans are not the same. Your eyes tell you that. True science tells you that.  Evolution and natural selection tell you that. Statistics tell you that.  Even your nose and ears tell you that. Your senses feed information to your brain so you can survive, that's the basic purpose of our senses.  And, you are to survive so you can make more like yourself.  To make more like yourself, you have to know who is like you and who isn't so that you don't turn into a baby factory for those unlike you and produce them instead of your own kind. The Blenders want to confuse you and blur the distinctions so you will commit your own genocide and turn your White family line into a non-White family line.  They want you to devolve back into the dark masses of humanity from which we Whites evolved not that may thousands of years ago.  They want to stop your evolution along a White line.  They want to destroy you and have you be assimilated and absorbed into the dark masses and cease to exist.  They want you and all Whites to go extinct.  They want you dead.
But there is something even more basic here that must be understood as to why the concept of  race is real and not just a social construct. And, it is this.  Every word ever uttered by any human is a made up word.  We make up words to distinguish between different things.  We humans need words to properly think about things.  We really can't think about things correctly unless we have  words for them.
Humans, with our large brains and a higher consciousness  and discernment than so-called lower organisms look around us and we see differences in different things and we make up words so we can think about them and also so we can know what is dangerous and what isn't, and for many other reasons.   Lower organisms might see a forest and think all the trees are the same.  Humans know there are differences, and we give the trees different names.  It is the same with everything else that humans encounter.  We have a higher level of discernment.  We see differences, we name the differences, we group like with like and we categorize things accordingly.  This is part of being intelligent.
It is the same with human types.  We have invented a word, "race," which is used to categorize different humans into different logical groups.   Because we have invented the word "race" does not mean it is a social construct--that the thing itself is not real--because the word is a made up word (like all words).  To think that there aren't different races of humans is akin to adopting  a position of such low consciousness that we must thereafter, to be consistent, not believe in breeds of dogs, or varieties of roses and return to a primitive sub-human ham handed state where we have, perhaps, a single word for, say, snakes.  And, in such a state of calling all snakes just snakes, we would fail to understand that snakes are not all the same and we would fail to understand that some snakes, such as dangerous rattlesnakes can kill us and others such as garter snakes can't. A snake is not just a snake and a human is not just a human. There are different types of each. 

 Furthermore, saying that race doesn't exist is the equivalent of saying Black humans, Yellow humans, Red humans, Brown humans and White humans don't exist.  Now, we know they do exist because we can see them..  And, our eyes tell us they are different.  And, we also know that  the differences extend far beyond skin color, but skin color, even if there were no other differences, is enough to classify some as this race and some as this other race.
The king of the human senses is eyesight. We can reason to this conclusion by understanding that our eyesight is linked closely to our instincts to mate.  Trust your eyes.  If another human doesn't look like you, they probably aren't like you.  And, if they aren't like you, they pose a danger to you either directly or indirectly in the sense that they possess genes that are unlike yours and if you mix your genes with theirs, you will produce non-White children and you will, in essence, kill off your Whiteness and set your family on a non-White trajectory.
Now, to go even further than this talk of races of humans, many of us say that race, as a term, does not go far enough and that the major races of humans (the colour coded ones) are actually different subspecies or even different species.
And, just a few last words.  Don't let the Blenders convince you that skin colour is meaningless.  Don't fall into that trap.  Skin colour is not like paint that is applied as an afterthought over identical model humans.  Skin colour is an essential part of humans and comes from within.  Whites are simply not White if they are not white.   (Upper case White means "non-Jewish white person of European descent."  Lower case white means a colour.)

By H. Millard © 2015

Saturday, January 24, 2015

New evidence suggests Stone Age hunters from Europe discovered America

 Tuesday 28 February 2012

New archaeological evidence suggests that America was first discovered by Stone Age people from Europe – 10,000 years before the Siberian-originating ancestors of the American Indians set foot in the New World.

A remarkable series of several dozen European-style stone tools, dating back between 19,000 and 26,000 years, have been discovered at six locations along the US east coast. Three of the sites are on the Delmarva Peninsular in Maryland, discovered by archaeologist Dr Darrin Lowery of the University of Delaware. One is in Pennsylvania and another in Virginia. A sixth was discovered by scallop-dredging fishermen on the seabed 60 miles from the Virginian coast on what, in prehistoric times, would have been dry land.
The new discoveries are among the most important archaeological breakthroughs for several decades - and are set to add substantially to our understanding of humanity's spread around the globe.

The similarity between other later east coast US and European Stone Age stone tool technologies has been noted before. But all the US European-style tools, unearthed before the discovery or dating of the recently found or dated US east coast sites, were from around 15,000 years ago - long after Stone Age Europeans (the Solutrean cultures of France and Iberia) had ceased making such artefacts. Most archaeologists had therefore rejected any possibility of a connection. But the newly-discovered and recently-dated early Maryland and other US east coast Stone Age tools are from between 26,000 and 19,000 years ago - and are therefore contemporary with the virtually identical western European material.

What’s more, chemical analysis carried out last year on a European-style stone knife found in Virginia back in 1971 revealed that it was made of French-originating flint.
Professor Dennis Stanford, of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC, and Professor Bruce Bradley of the University of Exeter, the two leading archaeologists who have analysed all the evidence, are proposing that Stone Age people from Western Europe migrated to North America at the height of the Ice Age by travelling (over the ice surface and/or by boat) along the edge of the frozen northern part of the Atlantic. They are presenting their detailed evidence in a new book - Across Atlantic Ice – published this month.

At the peak of the Ice Age, around three million square miles of the North Atlantic was covered in thick ice for all or part of the year.
However, the seasonally shifting zone where the ice ended and the open ocean began would have been extremely rich in food resources – migrating seals, sea birds, fish and the now-extinct northern hemisphere penguin-like species, the great auk.
Stanford and Bradley have long argued that Stone Age humans were quite capable of making the 1500 mile journey across the Atlantic ice - but till now there was comparatively little evidence to support their thinking.

But the new Maryland, Virginia and other US east coast material, and the chemical tests on the Virginian flint knife, have begun to transform the situation. Now archaeologists are starting to investigate half a dozen new sites in Tennessee, Maryland and even Texas – and these locations are expected to produce more evidence.
Another key argument for Stanford and Bradley’s proposal is the complete absence of any human activity in north-east Siberia and Alaska prior to around 15,500 years ago. If the Maryland and other east coast people of 26,000 to 19,000 years ago had come from Asia, not Europe, early material, dating from before 19,000 years ago, should have turned up in those two northern areas, but none have been found.

Although Solutrean Europeans may well have been the first Americans, they had a major disadvantage compared to the Asian-originating Indians who entered the New World via the Bering Straits or along the Aleutian Islands chain after 15,500 years ago.
Whereas the Solutreans had only had a 4500 year long ‘Ice Age’ window to carry out their migratory activity, the Asian-originating Indians had some 15,000 years to do it. What’s more, the latter two-thirds of that 15 millennia long period was climatologically much more favourable and substantially larger numbers of Asians were therefore able to migrate.
As a result of these factors the Solutrean (European originating) Native Americans were either partly absorbed by the newcomers or were substantially obliterated by them either physically or through competition for resources.

Some genetic markers for Stone Age western Europeans simply don’t exist in north- east Asia – but they do in tiny quantities among some north American Indian groups. Scientific tests on ancient DNA extracted from 8000 year old skeletons from Florida have revealed a high level of a  key probable European-originating genetic marker. There are also a tiny number of  isolated Native American groups whose languages appear not to be related in any way to Asian-originating American  Indian peoples.
But the greatest amount of evidence is likely to come from under the ocean – for most of the areas where the Solutreans would have stepped off the Ice onto dry land are now up to 100 miles out to sea.
The one underwater site that has been identified - thanks to the scallop dredgers – is set to be examined in greater detail this summer – either by extreme-depth divers or by remotely operated mini submarines equipped with cameras and grab arms.