CNF logo

CNF logo
Our symbol is the CELTIC CROSS an ancient Christian Symbol to represent Canadian Heritage , Cultural and Traditional Values!

Thursday, May 4, 2023

Federal government strips religious symbols from crown adorning Royal Coat of Arms

 *Another crime of Treason to add to the list of criminal acts perpetrated by Turdeau and his Fiberal/nDP Unholy alliance to attack Euro-Canadian Christian values, heritage, culture and traditions*

 

Federal government strips religious symbols from crown adorning Royal Coat of Arms

 Opinion by John Ivison

The top portion of Canada's Royal Coat of Arms as it currently looks, with a depiction of St. Edward's Crown, worn by Queen Elizabeth II. 

The top portion of Canada's Royal Coat of Arms as it currently looks, with a depiction of St. Edward's Crown, worn by Queen Elizabeth II.
 
 
 

OTTAWA — The Trudeau government is set to use the Coronation of King Charles III on Saturday as an opportunity to reveal a new design for the Canadian crown that sits on the Royal Coat of Arms.

Sources say the St. Edward’s Cross that has been part of the Coat of Arms since 1957 — and on a myriad of police and military badges across the country — will be replaced by what critics are calling “the Trudeau Crown,” a new design created by the Canadian Heraldic Authority, the body responsible for granting coats of arms in this country.

People who have seen the design say it replaces all Christian and religious symbols (crosses and fleur-de-lis) with maple leafs, snowflakes and stars, leading to claims that the Liberal government has politicized the symbol of the Crown and the Royal Coat of Arms.

“It means the proposed Canadian crown is totally unconnected to the King or the coronation, and it means the unity of the symbol of the Royal Crown that represents the sovereign throughout the realms will be broken, further distancing the King and the monarchy as an institution,” said Christopher McCreery, an author and historian with expertise on Canada’s relationship with the Crown.

“In essence, it is akin to a new national flag being raised on Canada Day, with no consultation or debate, developed in secret by those who wish to advance their personal vision of the country.”

Sovereigns have the right to choose which style of Royal Cross will represent their reign on coats of arms, coins, medals and other symbols of authority. 

 

 On Sept. 26 last year, Buckingham Palace announced that the new King would be represented by a Tudor Crown, instead of the St. Edward’s Crown used by his late mother, Queen Elizabeth. 

 

 Officials in Ottawa saw the announcement as an opportunity to introduce a new “Canadian Crown” and, over time, reinvent the supreme symbol of Canada, the Royal Coat of Arms.

The move is likely to provoke traditionalists, just as a similarly unilateral change upset conservatives in the mid-1990s. Then, Jean Chrétien’s Liberal government added a Latin inscription taken from the outer ring of the Order of Canada medal to the Coat of Arms: “Desiderantes Meliorem Patriam” (Desiring a better country).

Lack of consultation resulted in blowback in the House of Commons, where then Reform Party Leader Preston Manning asked then Heritage Minister Michel Dupuy who Canadian symbols belonged to: “To the sovereign, to the government, to some Liberal backbencher or to the people of Canada? Why were the people of Canada not consulted and involved in changes to the Canadian Coat of Arms?”

Such changes require the approval of the monarch but King Charles would have had little option but to say yes, if the new design was promoted on the advice of the Canadian government.

McCreery said there is a case to be made for adding some Indigenous symbols to Canada’s Coat of Arms “but this should be done cautiously and consultatively.”

The government could not provide comment on any consultations with Buckingham Palace by time of publication. 

 The Royal Coat of Arms was adopted by proclamation of King George V in 1921 and initially used the Tudor-style crown. In 1952, Queen Elizabeth adopted the St. Edward’s Crown, but it was not until 1957 that the government of Canada added it to the Canadian Royal Coat of Arms.

Aside from the addition of the Latin inscription in 1995, it has remained unchanged ever since. 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/john-ivison-federal-government-strips-religious-symbols-from-crown-adorning-royal-coat-of-arms/ar-AA1aEhx7 

Tuesday, May 2, 2023

Don Braid: Artur Pawlowski is guilty but martyred, with the unwitting help of Danielle Smith

 

Don Braid: Artur Pawlowski is guilty but martyred, with the unwitting help of Danielle Smith

The justice system thwarted Smith's personal preference for dropping 'political' charges. Pawlowski despises her for letting him down. And now he's forming a party to run against her

Author of the article:
Don Braid  •  Calgary Herald

Published May 02, 2023  •  Last updated 2 hours ago

 

 

Street preacher and political activist Artur Pawlowski speaks to reporters outside the Alberta legislature in Edmonton on Thursday, January 12, 2023.

 

 

 

Preacher Artur Pawlowski is very disappointed in UCP Leader Danielle Smith. As the election campaign began Monday, he counted her among “the snakes and the scorpions and the vipers already at each other’s throats.”

That’s ungrateful of him, it seems to me. Nobody has given Pawlowski more profile with the radical right than Smith.

Now he has more grist for martyrdom after being found guilty Tuesday of criminal mischief for his actions at the Coutts border blockade, as well as breaching a release order.

Smith foolishly took a phone call from Pawlowski in January. She voiced sympathy for dropping the charges against him, but said she couldn’t do it because prosecutors are so darned independent.

They proved that Tuesday.

The justice system thwarted the new premier’s personal preference for dropping “political” charges. Pawlowski despises her for letting him down. And now he’s forming a party to run against her.

Some phone call.

 

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/braid-artur-pawlowski-guilty-martyred-danielle-smith/wcm/e6e9723a-d4d5-4909-9a7a-38d607d40d9a 

Freedom Convoy trucker faces four criminal charges

 Freedom Convoy trucker faces four criminal charges

 

Monday, May 1, 2023

Vice Media preparing to file for bankruptcy - NYT

 *THAT IS WHAT YOU GET VICE WRITING BS ARTICLES ABOUT ME YOU COMMIE SCUM! HA-HA! *

Vice Media preparing to file for bankruptcy - NYT

 Story by Reuters


FILE PHOTO: Co-Founders of VICE Shane Smith and Suroosh Alvi pose as they arrive for the 20th Annual Webby Awards in Manhattan, New York

(Reuters) -Vice Media Group, the company behind popular media websites such as Vice and Motherboard, is preparing to file for bankruptcy, the New York Times reported on Monday, citing people with knowledge of its operations.

The media firm has received interest from five companies and might consider a sale to avoid bankruptcy, the NYT report said, adding that in the event of a bankruptcy, which could happen in the coming weeks, Vice's debtholder Fortress Investment Group could end up controlling the company. 

 

"Vice Media Group has been engaged in a comprehensive evaluation of strategic alternatives and planning. The company, its board and stakeholders continue to be focused on finding the best path for the company," the company spokesperson told Reuters in an emailed statement.

Its potential bankruptcy comes as several other media and technology firms have had to downsize in recent months due to a challenging economy and a weak advertising market.

Earlier this month, BuzzFeed Inc said it would shutter its news division, which gained renown for its irreverent and probing coverage, but ultimately succumbed to the challenges of its digital-first business model.

Last week, Vice Media said it will cancel popular TV program "Vice News Tonight" as part of a broader restructuring that will result in job cuts across the digital media firm's global news business, capping years of financial difficulties and top-executive departures.

Vice Media was among a group of fast-rising digital media ventures that once commanded rich valuations, as they courted millennial audiences. It rose to prominence alongside its provocative co-founder, Shane Smith, who built his media empire from a single Canadian magazine.

(Reporting by Baranjot Kaur in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Mrinmay Dey; Editing by Sherry Jacob-Phillips)

 

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstories/vice-media-preparing-to-file-for-bankruptcy-nyt/ar-AA1aBT88#image=1 

Liberals' online streaming Bill C-11 passes Parliament

 * Now the Liberal/nDP Government has complete control over the internet. *

 

Liberals' online streaming Bill C-11 passes Parliament

 

 image

 

After years of political pushback and considerable parliamentary scrutiny, the federal Liberal government's Online Streaming Act known as Bill C-11 passed the Senate and has become law.

Thursday evening, Bill C-11 cleared its final legislative hurdle in the Senate, seeing senators agree to bill sponsor Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez's take-some-and-leave-some approach to amendments made by the upper chamber.

This clears the path for the contentious bill, focused on substantively reforming the Broadcasting Act for the first time since 1991 to take into consideration online content, to come into effect.

After years of political pushback and considerable parliamentary scrutiny, the federal Liberal government's Online Streaming Act known as Bill C-11 passed the Senate and has become law.

Thursday evening, Bill C-11 cleared its final legislative hurdle in the Senate, seeing senators agree to bill sponsor Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez's take-some-and-leave-some approach to amendments made by the upper chamber.

This clears the path for the contentious bill, focused on substantively reforming the Broadcasting Act for the first time since 1991 to take into consideration online content, to come into effect.

Senators voting 52 to 16 on a motion informing the House of Commons that the Senate agreed with the version of Bill C-11 the majority of MPs passed last month, made passing the bill possible. The House was then informed of the Senate's decision, and royal assent was granted by 6:55 p.m. ET.

 

Bill C-11 is aimed at ensuring increasingly popular and profitable social media platforms and streaming services such as Netflix, Crave, Spotify, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+ and YouTube are subjected to Canadian content requirements and regulations comparable to traditional broadcasters. The policy change comes with a requirement for these platforms to spend millions investing in Canadian content and creators.

While the NDP and Bloc Quebecois, as well as many in the "CanCon" music, film, and television industries, have backed Bill C-11, alarms have been sounded by critics that the Liberal proposal could have knock-on effects for content creators and what everyday users see online, due to provisions that would require platforms to promote Canadian content.

In their efforts to lobby against this bill, some of the tech companies have gone to great lengths, such as YouTube, which ran an online campaign warning users who earn money from making videos about how the legislation could impact their livelihoods. The Conservatives, arguing that the legislation will have the impact of censoring what Canadians see online, led the charge against Bill C-11 inside Parliament.

As a result of this divide, this piece of legislation has been under the parliamentary microscope in both the House and Senate for more than a year, following a failed attempt prior to the last election.

Between the more than 100 amendments contemplated by the House of Commons, and the longest study ever conducted by a Senate committee, the minister responsible for Bill C-11 has repeatedly emphasized the important contributions of parliamentarians to the final wording of the legislation, while asserting that the time had come to "move on."

"Today, we are standing up for our stories, our artists, our producers and our creators. We're standing up so that Canadians have even more opportunities to see themselves in what they watch and listen to," said Rodriguez, reacting to the bill's passage in a statement.

"With this legislation, we are ensuring that Canada's incredible talent has a bigger and brighter stage online. They tell our stories, they make our voices heard, they contribute to our economy, and they make our culture what it is: strong, diverse and unique," the minister said. 

Over the last two weeks, the Senate has been mired in a largely procedural battle over whether to assert itself and insist on the substantive amendments made by the upper chamber that were rejected by the majority of MPs.

Attempts to have the Senate stand its ground on certain amendments were unsuccessful, seeing the majority of senators vote against related motions on Wednesday evening. Though, the passed motion was amended to note the Liberals gave a "public assurance" that Bill C-11 "will not apply to user-generated digital content."

A key sticking point raised in the numerous hours of debate recently held was the Senate's attempt to instill further protections for individual content creators in Bill C-11.

The government asserted that the existing safeguards in the bill were sufficient and rejected this amendment on the basis that it would impact the government's ability to "publicly consult on, and issue, a policy direction to the CRTC to appropriately scope the regulation of social media services."

While the Conservatives have pledged to repeal Bill C-11 should they form government, for now, seeing the Online Streaming Act become law is a long-awaited political victory for the Liberals.

Complicating the back and forth between those who think Bill C-11's critics were doing the bidding of big tech, and those who fear the legislation's free speech implications, is that a lot is being left to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) as the regulatory body to determine how the new rules will be enforced.

Now that Bill C-11 has passed, that regulatory work can begin.

The next step will be for the CRTC to get to work on drafting the policy framework for how the broadcasting and communications regulator will implement the new powers Bill C-11 grants, informed by a federal policy directive as well as public consultations.

The draft federal policy direction will be published in the Canada Gazette, for the public, artists, digital creators, and businesses to read and provide feedback on. The draft will then be updated and re-published, taking into consideration what the government hears. The CRTC will also give notice about its consultation plans, regarding how it intends to enforce Bill C-11. This will include multiple public proceedings.

It is expected that the consultations will be where stakeholders with outstanding concerns about the bill turn next. Marking Bill C-11's passage, internet advocacy organization OpenMedia accused the Senate of backing down and letting a version of the bill become law that is "largely unchanged" from the initial version tabled in Parliament in February 2022.

"Make no mistake: the fight isn’t over yet. While legal protection of our content was the best option, Heritage Minister Rodriguez can still issue a clear policy direction to the CRTC that tells them our user content should not be regulated in practice, and our choices must be respected. That's where the fight will go next," said OpenMedia campaigns director Matt Hatfield.

In an email to CTV News, TikTok spokesperson Danielle Morgan said that they plan to keep fighting for the interests of Canadian digital-first creators to be able to "create content for global audiences without being subject to gatekeepers or encumbered by regulatory red tape."

Remarking on the passage of Bill C-11, pro-Canadian broadcasting organization FRIENDS called it "one of the most epic Canadian stories ever told."

"While we wholeheartedly applaud the House and the Senate for the leading roles they have played in this suspense-filled drama, there is still work to be done before the credits roll on Bill C-11," said FRIENDS executive director Marla Boltman in a statement, indicating plans to push the CRTC to make sure the standards are equal for Canadian broadcasters and streaming giants' Canadian content requirements, or decades of "carefully crafted cultural policy" meant to protect Canadian talent could be undermined.

Also flagging concerns about the legislation as drafted leading to a two-tier system, the Canadian Media Producers Association said that it still welcomes the bill and expressed gratitude for Rodriguez' "heroic efforts" in securing its passage.

"We are on the precipice of a pivotal moment in Canadian broadcasting history. It took 30 years before the Broadcasting Act was updated. Since we don’t know when this opportunity will present itself again, it’s important that we get it right,” said the CMPA’s president and CEO Reynolds Mastin in a statement.

It remains to be seen what the timeline will be for Bill C-11's policy changes to come into effect. 

Copyright: CTV News/THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang

 

https://www.iheartradio.ca/am-1150/news/liberals-online-streaming-bill-c-11-passes-parliament-1.19586846 

Thursday, April 27, 2023

Danger Cats discuss the Coutts 4:

 Danger Cats discuss the Coutts 4:

 

Leigh Stewy's Telegram for News and Video

 


 

 “The laws in this country aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on”



 
 

 

Southwestern Ontario township votes against flying Pride flags on municipal property

 

Southwestern Ontario township votes against flying Pride flags on municipal property

Author of the article:


The Canadian Press
Jessica Smith
Published Apr 27, 2023  •  2 minute read
 
 Denise Caskanette, left, with daughter Violet and mother Annette Zeyl, rallied outside Norwich Township's council building on Tuesday to protest a motion banning non-government flags, including Pride flags, on municipal property. They were also showing support for a separate motion to declare June as Pride month in the rural township. (Calvi Leon/The London Free Press) 
 
 

NORWICH, Ont. — A township in southwestern Ontario has voted to prohibit Pride flags on municipal property, prompting expressions of dismay from some residents.

The council for the Township of Norwich passed a motion Tuesday night to fly only the flags of the federal, provincial and municipal governments on its property.

The motion, which passed 3-2, specified that Pride flags would be among those that would be banned. And only banners for decoration or those that promote downtown businesses can be flown on municipal street light poles, it said.

Coun. Jim Scholten, who introduced the motion, said he wanted to change the township’s flag policy to “maintain the unity” of the community.

“By flying these flags alone on township property, we can coexist in peace and harmony no matter who we are or what we believe,” he said.

Having a broader flag policy would lead to endless requests for various flags to be flown, he said.

 

“Each one would be subject to judgment or scrutiny based on its merits,” he said. “This in turn would inevitably lead to more disunity and alienation of people.”

Resident Cody Neville, who is gay, said he feels the motion that was passed sends the message that members of the LGBTQ community don’t matter.

“It feels like we went back several decades,” he said. “To say that I’m heartbroken and devastated is an understatement for the queer community, and the queer youth specifically.”

The council also voted against a motion that would proclaim June as a Pride month in the municipality beginning this summer.

The township saw several cases of vandalism last year involving Pride flags and banners in support of the LGBTQ community.

“I’m just so sad for the youth that have to witness that in today’s day and age,” Neville said of those cases, calling the township a “divided” community.

“I’m proud to be from Norwich but it’s getting harder and harder to say that and tell people where I’m from, because they see the news and they hear what goes on and they just can’t fathom how I could be happy to be from a place that wants to repress who I am.”

Tara King, who also lives in Norwich, said she was “embarrassed” by the outcome of the vote on flags.

“I was disappointed to be part of this community,” she said. “This is not representative of me.”

The high school teacher said she worries for the well-being of her two children, who attend school in the area, as well as for the students she teaches.

“I wonder about the emotional impact that this is going to have on our community,” she said. “It’s certainly not going to unify our community. It’s going to further divide our community”

 

https://windsorstar.com/news/local-news/southwestern-ontario-township-votes-against-flying-pride-flags-on-municipal-property 

Ex-Tucker Carlson Producer Suing Him For ‘Sexism’ Has Never Even Met Him

 Ex-Tucker Carlson Producer Suing Him For ‘Sexism’ Has Never Even Met Him

 

Ludicrous.

Published

 

 Abby Grossberg, the former Tucker Carlson producer who is suing the ex-Fox News host for ‘sexism’, has never even met him, her own lawyer admits.

Grossberg has been busy on a media tour accusing Carlson of “breaking” her and making her life a “living hell” by creating a “sexist” and “anti-semitic” workplace.

However, she has never even personally met Carlson while working on his show, according to a report by the Spectator.

“Like many on the [Tucker Carlson Tonight] staff, Abby never met Tucker Carlson in person because he taped the show from his personal studios in Maine and Florida, and he did not visit Fox’s NY HQ during her time there,” Kimberly A. Catala, one of the attorneys representing Grossberg, said.

Grossberg, who was head of bookings for the show between July 2022 and March 2023, claims that while working out of Fox’s Manhattan office she was subjected to bullying and mean comments about being Jewish.

One such “bullying” incident included Grossberg being called a “scrooge” for going around the office turning off Christmas decorations.

Wow. Poor baby.

“Tucker and his executive producer Justin Wells, who was also fired, really were responsible for breaking me and making my life a living hell,” Grossberg told MSNBC this week.

 Really?

How can someone you’ve never even met have such a negative impact? Sounds like utter nonsense.

Grossberg’s lawsuit against Carlson was one of the reasons cited by media reports that motivated Rupert Murdoch to drop the network’s top rated news host.

As we document in the video below, her claims about what was said to her in the office are likely to form part of a ‘dirt dossier’ Fox News has on Carlson that it is preparing to hand to legacy media outlets if Carlson attacks the network.

 

https://summit.news/2023/04/27/ex-tucker-carlson-producer-suing-him-for-sexism-has-never-even-met-him/